Personal tools
You are here: Home Lists ZPUG DC List Archives 2005 2005-06 archetype epozwidgeted textfield issue / John Kavanagh <jkavanagh@earthsat.com>
Navigation
Log in


Forgot your password?
New user?
Mailing Lists
You can read our ZPUGDC mailing list archives online.
You can subscribe to our mailing list:
Book Review

The Definitive Guide to Plone

Reviewer: joel
 

archetype epozwidgeted textfield issue / John Kavanagh <jkavanagh@earthsat.com>

archetype epozwidgeted textfield issue
John Kavanagh <jkavanagh(at)earthsat.com>
2005-06-06 09:06:47 [ FULL ]
Hey, ZPUGDC.

I'd appreciate your insight with this problem...

A Plone site uses an Archetype with an EpozWidgeted TextField containing 
HTML-styled text. In the view of that Archetype, the TextField is 
rendered correctly with a tal:content='structure here/textfieldname' ... 
correctly meaning the HTML styling appears.

In a different Plone Template, a Portal Catalog query returns a content 
item of that Archetype. The content item object is retrieved with a 
getObject call on a Portal Catalog result. The value of the EpozWidgeted 
TextField is retrieved with getTextfieldname.

Unfortunately, in this situation, the value of the TextField is rendered 
incorrectly with a tal:content='structure here/textfieldname' ... 
incorrectly meaning no HTML formatting appears - only the raw text.

Do you know why the HTML formatting is lost in the second situation?
Is the getTextfieldname function part of the problem?

Thanks for your ideas!
[...]

Re: [ZPUGDC] archetype epozwidgeted textfield issue / Alex Clark <aclark@aclark.NET>

Re: [ZPUGDC] archetype epozwidgeted textfield issue
Alex Clark <aclark(at)aclark.NET>
2005-06-07 10:01:23 [ FULL ]
Is this still an "open issue" ? :-)

On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:05:57AM -0400, John Kavanagh wrote:[...]
[...]

Re: [ZPUGDC] archetype epozwidgeted textfield issue / John Kavanagh <jkavanagh@earthsat.com>

Re: [ZPUGDC] archetype epozwidgeted textfield issue
John Kavanagh <jkavanagh(at)earthsat.com>
2005-06-07 10:05:17 [ FULL ]
> Is this still an "open issue" ? :-)

Yes, although Suresh Eddala has been very helpful. I've attached the 
alternatives we've tried, without success.
[...]
Attachments: 
Attached Message application/octet-stream - 1563 Bytes
Attached Message application/octet-stream - 3502 Bytes
Attached Message application/octet-stream - 3765 Bytes

Powered by Plone, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards: