|
|
PloneMalBoxer vs Mailboxer / David Diskin <david.diskin@verizon.net>
PloneMalBoxer vs Mailboxer
David Diskin <david.diskin(at)verizon.net> |
2004-10-22 21:51:02 |
[
FULL ]
|
Does anyone know if PloneMailBoxer is usable and worthwhile? Can
Mailboxer be used in Plone easily if PloneMailBoxer is not ready for prime
time? Thanks very much,
David
[...]
|
Re: [ZPUGDC] PloneMalBoxer vs Mailboxer / Joel Burton <joel@joelburton.com>
Re: [ZPUGDC] PloneMalBoxer vs Mailboxer
Joel Burton <joel(at)joelburton.com> |
2004-10-24 09:03:50 |
[
FULL ]
|
On Friday 22 October 2004 11:00 pm, David Diskin wrote:[...]
PMB is what we use at zpugdc.org. You can use MB in Plone, but it
provides no Plone-compatible skins. That's what PMB aims to do.
The HEAD version of PMB in the Collective CVS is horribly broken and
borked. Instead, use the branch that I modified for ZPUG. It was
supposed to be called something like "jb-branch" or such, but the
person that checked it in got that name wrong--I forget how. But it
should be easy to figure out.
HTH,
- j.
[...]
|
|
|
Re: [ZPUGDC] PloneMalBoxer vs Mailboxer / Tom von Schwerdtner <tvon@etria.com>
Re: [ZPUGDC] PloneMalBoxer vs Mailboxer
Tom von Schwerdtner <tvon(at)etria.com> |
2004-10-24 13:02:51 |
[
FULL ]
|
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 10:13 -0400, Joel Burton wrote:
[...]
That was me. I think I was talking to Todd Berman on IRC or something
when I was doing the checkin and got the initials screwey.
Apologies :-D
The actual name of the branch is Plone2-tb
Regards,
Tom
Tom von Schwerdtner
Etria, LLP - www.etria.com
|
|
|
|